tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5123697.post111989425555417231..comments2023-10-17T06:08:27.032-05:00Comments on Grantian Florilegium: The Officially-Atheist Regimegileskirkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11546229381528820614noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5123697.post-1120069313301758532005-06-29T13:21:00.000-05:002005-06-29T13:21:00.000-05:00Gary North, in _Political Polytheism_, says John Q...Gary North, in _Political Polytheism_, says John Quincy Adams was mixed up because the Constitution had already endorsed an "Atheist Regime". Gary DeMar, in _God and Government_, Vol 1, says it's not yet an Atheist Regime because we still have "in the year of our Lord" in the text of the Constitution. Greg Bahnsen would examine these thoughts logically. Whether North is right or not is of no significance. It's the current amended Constitution which is relevant. If DeMar is right then it should be a trivial exercise to simply impeach those judges who rule contrary to the Constitution. It's not going to happen. DeMar is incorrect. The United States is under an Atheist Regime. The currently amended Constitution endorses an Atheist Regime.<BR/><BR/>Conclusion: A new Constitutional amendment replacing article VI paragraph 3 with something much like the original Delaware Charter had: an oath confessing belief in<BR/>the "Divinity of both the Old and New Testaments".Harry A. Rockefellerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15274310744428418221noreply@blogger.com