tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5123697.post115323895430579987..comments2023-10-17T06:08:27.032-05:00Comments on Grantian Florilegium: Science: the Fruit of Christianitygileskirkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11546229381528820614noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5123697.post-1153687221504178512006-07-23T15:40:00.000-05:002006-07-23T15:40:00.000-05:00Karen: Yes, that's it.Karen: Yes, that's it.gileskirkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11546229381528820614noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5123697.post-1153621516830598312006-07-22T21:25:00.000-05:002006-07-22T21:25:00.000-05:00Karen: Well, the "particular methodology" was what...Karen: Well, the "particular methodology" was what we call the "scientific method," which was the heart and soul of the Society.gileskirkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11546229381528820614noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5123697.post-1153573311686717762006-07-22T08:01:00.000-05:002006-07-22T08:01:00.000-05:00I agree. God has authority in one sense, but in a...I agree. God has authority in one sense, but in another He merely lives, moves, has His being and this is enough to make something so. Authority after DeCartes meant that objective standards outside of God existed. Our God is more than an objective standard. He is the All-objective being.Occidoxyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05512575669827021503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5123697.post-1153571052400987542006-07-22T07:24:00.000-05:002006-07-22T07:24:00.000-05:00Karen: Actually, the motto is a challenge to the a...Karen: Actually, the motto is a challenge to the autonomous authority of either the pronouncements of "the experts" or the assumptions of "tradition." It was more a statement about particular methodology than of universal epistemology. Therefore, it was a challenge to man's authority not to God's.gileskirkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11546229381528820614noreply@blogger.com