On this day in 1979, Francis Schaeffer gave an historic
speech which would form the basis of
his landmark book A Christian
Manifesto. He asserted that
"the basic problem with Christians in this country" over the last two
generations or more has been that "they have seen things in bits and
pieces instead of totals.” The
result has been a kind of hesitant hit-or-miss approach to the dire dilemmas of
our day: “They have very gradually become disturbed over permissiveness,
pornography, the public schools, the breakdown of the family, and finally
abortion. But they have not seen
this as a totality--each thing being a part, a symptom, of a much larger
problem.”
He said that part of the reason for this was: “They failed
to see that all of this has come about due to a shift in worldview--that is,
through a fundamental change in the overall way people think a view the world
and life as a whole.”
When the subject of worldview comes up, we generally think of philosophy. We think of intellectual niggling. We think of the brief and blinding
oblivion of ivory tower speculation, of thickly obscure tomes, and of
inscrutable logical complexities.
In fact, a worldview is as practical as potatoes. It is less metaphysical than understanding
marginal market buying at the stock exchange or legislative initiatives in
congress. It is less esoteric than
typing a book into a laptop computer or sending a fax across the continent. It is instead as down to earth as
tilling the soil for a bed of zinnias.
The word itself is a poor English attempt at translating the
German weltanshauung. It literally means a life perspective
or a way of seeing. It is simply
the way we look at the world.
You have a worldview.
I have a worldview.
Everyone does. It is our
perspective. It is our frame of
reference. It is the means by
which we interpret the situations and circumstances around us. It is what enables us to integrate all
the different aspects of our faith, and life, and experience.
Alvin Toffler, in his book Future Shock said: “Every person carries in his head a mental model
of the world, a subjective representation of external reality.”
This mental model is, he says, like a giant filing
cabinet. It contains a slot for
every item of information coming to us.
It organizes our knowledge and gives us a grid from which to think. Our mind is not as Pelagius, Locke,
Voltaire, or Rousseau would have had us suppose—a tabla rasa, a blank and impartial slate. None of us are completely open-minded or genuinely
objective. “When we think,” said
economic philosopher E.F. Schumacher, “we can only do so because our mind is
already filled with all sorts of ideas with which to think.” These more or less fixed notions make
up our mental model of the world, our frame of reference, our
presuppositions--in other words, our worldview.
Thus, a worldview is simply a way of viewing the world. Nothing could be simpler. But by raising the issue when he did
and how he did, Francis Schaeffer altogether altered the terms of the
theological debate in America and ushered in a new wave of reform.
Summit maintains a worldview chart that is pretty helpful here:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.summit.org/resources/worldview-chart/
I agree with Schumacher's observation that people interpret things according to their worldview. I would add that people can be more objective, despite having a worldview, when they are taught to apply logic - the formal and informal kind - to their reasoning about the world.